Yemen · 2026 HNRP
Four in five dollars of the plan requirement remained uncovered
19.0% covered
Uncovered against plan: US$1.751bn (81.0%).
WorldsAid · Monthly evidence brief · Issue 01
A dated comparison of funding reported against two major humanitarian response plans. The first issue sets out the gap in the available data as clearly as the gap in funding.
Snapshot retrieved: 29 September 2026 · Primary source: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service (FTS)
Key finding: OCHA FTS reports 19.0% coverage for Yemen’s 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan and 46.9% for Nigeria’s 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan. The difference is 27.9 percentage points. These are plan-coverage figures at the retrieval date, not estimates of all aid reaching either country.
Yemen · 2026 HNRP
19.0% covered
Uncovered against plan: US$1.751bn (81.0%).
Nigeria · 2026 HNRP
46.9% covered
Uncovered against plan: US$274.3m (53.1%).
| Response plan | Plan requirement | FTS funding | Coverage | Uncovered against plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yemen 2026 HNRP | US$2,162,563,336 | US$411,259,993 | 19.0% | US$1,751,303,343 · 81.0% |
| Nigeria 2026 HNRP | US$516,399,423 | US$242,079,623 | 46.9% | US$274,319,800 · 53.1% |
Coverage is calculated as OCHA FTS reported incoming funding divided by the plan requirement, using the figures displayed on the linked plan pages when retrieved on 29 September 2026. Displayed percentages are rounded to one decimal place; dollar gaps are calculated from the displayed source amounts.
The figures show a marked difference in the share of each plan requirement reported as funded. Yemen’s reported coverage is lower, and its absolute uncovered requirement is larger. Both plans still show substantial uncovered requirements.
This is a funding-gap comparison, not a finding about donor intent or media attention. Plan scope, target populations, prioritisation, timing, and reporting completeness differ. A low coverage rate alone cannot establish donor fatigue, the total resources reaching a country, or which needs are going unmet.
WorldsAid does not yet hold a validated monthly funding ledger or a consistent measure of media attention for sudden-onset emergencies. This first issue therefore does not assign a composite “donor fatigue” score or rank emergencies against media events. Future editions will show a longitudinal anomaly only when the underlying time series and comparison groups are documented and comparable.
The report is designed for monthly publication. The next edition will add a month-to-month funding movement only after an earlier dated snapshot is preserved and checked against the same plan scope.
Reuse WorldsAid’s original calculation and this compiled snapshot under CC BY 4.0. OCHA FTS remains the source of the reported funding and requirement figures; source rights and attribution still apply.
Download snapshot CSVDownload snapshot JSON
Suggested press line: “OCHA’s funding tracker showed 19.0% coverage of Yemen’s 2026 response plan and 46.9% coverage of Nigeria’s plan when WorldsAid retrieved the figures on 29 September 2026.”
Please include the retrieval date and link to the OCHA plan pages when quoting these figures. WorldsAid is independent and is not an OCHA publication.